AI assisted daily observations, insights and applications.
I've lived a minimal life in many ways, but the last 16 years - and owning a large property and land - have given me the opportunity to accumulate an excess of physical goods, some of which are required to maintain the land and houses, but many of which are simply kept because we have the space and live by frugal/ecological rules.
I got hooked on Shark Tank - the U.S version - this year and quickly watched all of the episodes and then followed this up with Dragon's Den, which was a UK precursor of Shark Tank.
I had seen negative stories on Social Media about Steven Bartlett supporting products with dubious scientific merit and was a bit skeptical when I saw that he was one of the Dragons in later episodes, but I quickly found him to be knowledgable and genuine and to have his ego most in balance than some of his more established - and older - co-hosts.
I'd long been aware of the title of his book but had not made the connection that he was the author and I had it in my wishlist on Audible, so decided to give it a short when I finished up reading The Hard Things about Hard Things and I've got to say that much of the advice and the wayin which is it set-out and delivers is both relatable and pragmatic and provides an actionable set of guidelines for building up your own personal pathway to success and happiness.
The idea of capturing a place that was once loved and then abandoned has been the central theme of all my photographic work for 30 years.
I searched for over 4 years to find my own broken dream tos hower love and attention on and always in the back of my mind I dreamed about how it might look one day in the future once it was abandoned again.
The book is a deep and slightly heavy read about the transferable power of thinking in systems, which really seems like the superpower in the current wave of AI vibe engineering.
Yes, these tools democratise access to building complex software applications, but in reality all this is doing is moving the bottleneck to another part of the process, for example Product Management or Strategy.
The engineers who are seeing the highest productivity gains using AI are those with more high level experience, architecture and system thinking, and while being able to read the code might help to debug sticky situations, most of the real gains come from simply understanding how to solve technical problems using a reliable process.
Agentic co-workers will be the norm by next year, according to Asha Sharma.
The vision of how AI will drastically change the process of most companies is compelling, as is the vision of organic products, which grow, scale, shift and develop into personalised organisms, fed on the client data and developed 24/7 by a self-healing agentic architecture.
I am remote-first, I have worked remotely for 25 years - including 3 years in a campervan on the beaches and mountains of Europe using a 3G router (hot tip, coverage was much better when you parked up next to the city).
Email is a black hole at the best of times, and when you are dealing with an emotional situation where tempers are high and patience in short supply, it might be time to break the mold and go Physical First, because somethings might be best resolved in person, face to face, mano a mano.
As I get older, I've started to take less physical risks, stepped down where I might have once jumped, swam out less far, carried less weight, but when it comes to the crunch, can my body still take the same physical loads it once did?
Today while I was up on the roof cleaning the chimney I disturbed a wasps nest and was getting roundly stung - faced with two options, stay or jump.. I jumped - I had already considered the option before it happened and had the escape route in mind, but when needed, my body performed well, the landing was smooth and I learned to trust myself a bit more.
The stings sting, but the overall experience was positive.
When AI creates its own code, why would it use a programming language?
https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/14jjptg/when_ai_creates_its_own_code_why_would_it_use_a/
If you live off the grid in a remote or even relatively remote location - like we do - you soon learn the importance of redundancy - that is having more than one way to do something important, such as make energy, store water or resolve some other problem that if not solved quickly would fundamentally make your lifestyle not viable.
Bureaucracy is something else I have spent a considerable amount of effort trying to avoid also, having lived in several different countries and having had to register, open bank accounts, join social and health schemes all in foreign languages, this has often been a stressful and powerless experience.
I'd like to buy a super tiny, but super high resolution camera which compares in quality to the lens and sensors in the pixel 8 pro phone, but which is tiny and can be positioned on the end of a flexible tripod with a clamp or even stuck on to the end of a stick to get almost impossible shots.
Video not available
I'm not very good at waiting when I feel like the outcome of a process is out of my control, and this week there is a lot going on.
It was helpful to me to learn this concept from Jeff Bezos, who suggests that stress primarily arises from not taking action on things within one's control: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQHmeRIhNtw
All disruptive technology - think mobile, social - has created a delayed distribution advantage for start-ups to reach escape velocity before incumbents catch-up and consume the new opportunity - Brian Balfour proposes that the AI distribution gap might be provided by openAI and chatGPT specifically, but that this will be a time limited opportunity which favours first movers and he warns that historically, these gaps have always eventually been gated be the not so benevolent hosts.
This concept applies to various fields, including music, mathematics, and even the way we perceive the world. In music, scales define the relationships between notes and intervals. In mathematics, scale refers to the size or magnitude of a quantity. In general, natural scale implies a fundamental or inherent size or proportion that something possesses, either physically or conceptually.
I love stone and specifically buildings made from stone - it's an enduring material that wears and polishes with time, but when it comes to working alone, wood is king, it is light, malleable, and forgiving, so even the least skilled craftsman can still produce a good finished object.
But, sadly, it's relative softness also means that it does not last forever.
The idea that people should fit into a culture makes sense, until you examine it and realise that the the strength of a culture is diversity, not conformity - which is why the idea of measuring for cultural add - what new cultural elements does someone new add to a culture, instead of how well they would fit into the existing culture, is important.
AI was not much use to me this week when one of the charge controllers on our off-grid energy system melted down - I knew how to fix the issue, and the system itself is so unique that no amount of AI summaries could really add consequential input and sadly I had no robotics to help clean up battery terminals, rewise machines and route cables.
My key takeaway from this book is a simple, but reliable way to quantify the culture of an organisation - speak to new hires two weeks after they have joined - whatever they tell you about how the company works is a key insight - they will already be adapting to the new culture, they will know who to speak to to get things done, the right tone and tempo and other valuable things that you could never find out.
Culture is how people behave when the boss is not around, but the CEO can't ask her managers to describe this and expect anything but a managed answer - what she might want to hear - but asking directly, she will have trigger the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle of management and in doing so influenced the answer to the question, most probably unwillingly and unknowingly.